We ran the same application pipeline through both trackers — capturing postings with each browser extension, moving cards between stages, setting follow-up reminders.
The split is philosophical. Teal is a career platform with a tracker inside it. Huntr leads with the board, though it now bundles a resume builder of its own.
| Teal | Huntr | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Tracker + resume builder; AI capped | Board + extension; 100-job cap |
| Browser extension | Yes — clips postings to board | Yes — clips postings to board |
| Resume tools | Built-in free builder + AI job matching | Free builder + basic scoring; AI is Pro |
| Interface | Feature-rich, can feel busy | Clean, board-first |
| Paid tier | Teal+ from $9/wk (≈$36/mo) | Pro $40/mo (AI documents) |
| Best for | Light AI feedback plus tracking in one place | A visual kanban pipeline |
| Not for | Heavy AI use on the free plan | Unlimited AI without the $40/mo tier |

Connection. Because the resume builder lives beside the tracker, Teal scores your resume against each saved job’s description — tailoring guidance no pure tracker can offer.
If you’d otherwise juggle a separate builder and a separate keyword tool, the bundle earns its clutter.

Focus. The board is cleaner, the capture-to-card flow is frictionless, and the platform around it stays quieter than Teal’s — even with Huntr’s own resume builder now in the sidebar.
People who want the pipeline front and center tend to prefer Huntr’s calm.
Both free tiers survive a focused search. Both have a wall.
Teal’s wall is usage: AI analysis caps arrive quickly once you’re saving jobs daily. Its upgrade is billed weekly ($9/wk ≈ $36/mo if left running), so set a cancellation reminder if you subscribe for a sprint.
Huntr’s wall is volume: the free tier tracks up to 100 jobs.
Paid, they converge — Teal+ at roughly $36/month versus Huntr Pro at $40/month. Choose by which AI toolset you’d actually use, not by price.
Worth asking. If you’re applying to fewer than about 15 roles, a spreadsheet genuinely works — the value of a tracker is the browser extension that captures a posting in one click, and that only pays off at volume.
Where trackers earn their keep is follow-up discipline. Most candidates lose interviews to silence, not rejection, and a board that surfaces “applied 10 days ago, no reply” is what prompts the nudge. Our job application guide covers where follow-up fits in the sequence.
Full hands-on writeups for each: the Teal review and the Huntr review. If forms rather than organization are your bottleneck, the Simplify review covers the autofill-first alternative — and our career tool reviews index has the rest.
For pure tracking, Huntr — cleaner board, less surrounding platform. For tracking connected to resume tooling, like keyword scoring against each saved job, Teal. Both free tiers work for a focused search.
Both have real free tiers with no credit card. Teal’s caps are on AI usage; Huntr’s cap is 100 tracked jobs plus 2 job-tailored resumes. Long, high-volume searches eventually hit either wall.
Yes — both clip a job posting into your board in one click, which is the feature that beats spreadsheets. The extensions are comparable; the platforms around them are what differ.
They land close. Teal+ is billed weekly ($9/wk ≈ $36/month if left running) and Huntr Pro is $40/month. Pick by feature set — Teal’s per-job analysis versus Huntr’s AI document generation — and set a cancellation reminder for a sprint either way.
For a small search, yes. Under roughly 15 applications a spreadsheet is fine. Past that, the one-click capture from a browser extension saves enough time to justify a real tracker.